On 23 June 2015 the Federal Court of Australia gave judgment in an appeal from a decision of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (“SCT”) to affirm the trustee’s determination to pay death benefits to the deceased’s adult children. The decision can be accessed here: http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCA/2015/612.html
The deceased made no binding death benefit nomination and the legal personal representative of the estate was unable to persuade the trustee to pay the death benefits to the estate, which was subject to an application for further provision from the estate.
Ultimately, the Court upheld the decision of the SCT, so the death benefits will be paid to the adult children of the deceased and therefore will not be available in the family provision proceedings.
The judgment is an interesting read and provides a summary of the relevant matters the SCT will take into account when determining the payment of superannuation death benefits.
Here are those specified reasons for the SCT’s decision:
44. First, superannuation is not an asset of the estate and a trustee is not bound to follow the directions of a will. Even if superannuation is specifically mentioned in a will, it does not make it an asset subject to the terms of the will.
45. The subject matter of proceedings commenced by the Adult Sons against the executors of the Deceased Member’s estate under Part IV of the Administrative and Probate Act 1958 relates to inadequate provision for their proper maintenance out of the estate of the Deceased Member. The complaint to the Tribunal concerns the distribution of the death benefit, which is not part of the estate.
46. Although the Trustee will look to a deceased member’s will and any other document which purports to identify the wishes of a deceased member to assist in determining the wishes of the member, the role of the Trustee in the distribution of a death benefit is not to resolve any perceived or real issues in a deceased member’s estate.
47. Second, the Trustee must decide the distribution of a death benefit unless there is in force a binding death benefit nomination. In this matter, the Deceased Member did not have a binding nomination of beneficiary for receipt of his superannuation although it was permitted under the Trust Deed.
48. Third, in general a trustee does not pay to the LPR unless there are no dependants or if there were such a direction in a binding death benefit nomination. The Trustee submitted that it follows this general procedure. It stated that it is not the practice of the Trustee to pay the benefit to a deceased member’s LPR if the deceased member is survived by dependants.
49. Finally, while the Deceased Member may have been of an age where he could have received the benefit directly, the benefit remained in the superannuation system at the time of his death and subject to a decision of the Trustee.
50. The Tribunal concluded that, having identified dependants and with no binding nomination to pay to the LPR it was not unreasonable for the Trustee to follow its practice to pay to dependants.”
To view more information about our Wills and Probate service please click here